/* SECTION - Category Page
   ========================================================================
   THIS FILE IS INTENTIONALLY EMPTY. Every rule the category page needs now
   lives in the "Brand refresh: shared page components" section at the foot of
   css-components.css, scoped to `html.category-page, html.section-page`.

   It got there in two moves, both of them the same rule applied twice: a
   component with a second consumer moves up the load order rather than being
   copied.

     - 2026-10-23, first move. The hero band, the section heading and the Icon
       Graphic card (.kb-page-hero*, .kb-section-title, .kb-section-card*,
       .kb-icon-graphic) were written here and moved the same day, when the
       section page was rebuilt on the same three components.
     - 2026-10-23, second move. The Recent updates card (.kb-updates-grid,
       .kb-update-card*, .kb-badge) stayed behind in that first move, on the
       stated grounds that "the section page has no equivalent block: its own
       article list is the full list of that section's articles, which is a
       different component and a different job". Joy's preview retired that
       reasoning the same evening -- "let's make them cards in the same format
       as the recent updates cards" -- so the section page's article list *is*
       this card now, and the rules followed the route this file's own note had
       already described for them.

   WHY NOT KEEP THEM HERE AND WIDEN THE SCOPE TO BOTH PAGES. Load order.
   document_head.hbs loads this file at line 230 and css-page-section.css at
   line 221, so a shared base kept here would sit *after* the page file meant to
   override it, and every section-page override would lose its specificity tie.
   css-components.css at line 220 is before both.

   WHY THE FILE IS STILL HERE AT ALL, rather than deleted along with its
   <link>. Two reasons, and the first is the real one: the Contact support CTA
   is commented out in both templates awaiting a refreshed design, and that
   round is the next thing to land on these two pages. If its treatment turns
   out to differ between them, this is where the category page's half goes.
   Second, deleting the asset means editing document_head.hbs, which is the one
   file whose line numbers half the comments in assets/ cite. Not worth it for
   two empty requests; worth revisiting once the CTA round has settled.

   SO: TO CHANGE HOW THIS PAGE LOOKS, EDIT css-components.css -- and expect the
   change to land on the section page too. That is the point of the sharing
   rather than a side effect, and it is why both pages were brought onto one set
   of components instead of two sets that drift.
   ===================================================================== */
